| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Runtime Partition Pruning |
| Date: | 2017-11-10 02:03:43 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+Nukzw6NRSaNLKcN10NJ9-fxow7YvWtMz_PSo_LkxmNw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 6:18 AM, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> The code still chooses the custom plan instead of the generic plan for
>> the prepared statements. I am working on it.
>
> I don't think it's really the job of this patch to do anything about
> that problem.
>
+1. I think if we really want to do something about plan choice when
partitions are involved that should be done as a separate patch.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-11-10 02:31:22 | Re: [POC] Faster processing at Gather node |
| Previous Message | chiru r | 2017-11-10 01:52:32 | Re: [HACKERS] OpeSSL - PostgreSQL |