| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alexey Lesovsky <lesovsky(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |
| Date: | 2021-11-02 05:36:27 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+NJ2Mg+1QNYNKgq1MY4od9yT+DNfS0ohw4GgaWnWXpbQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 7:25 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 12:21 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Don't we want these stats to be dealt in the same way as tables and
> > functions as all the stats entries (subscription entries) are specific
> > to a particular database? If so, I think we should write/read these
> > to/from db specific stats file in the same way as we do for tables or
> > functions. I think in the current patch, it will unnecessarily read
> > and probably write subscription stats even when those are not
> > required.
>
> Good point! So probably we should have PgStat_StatDBEntry have the
> hash table for subscription worker statistics, right?
>
Yes.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-11-02 05:46:23 | Re: parallel vacuum comments |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-11-02 05:34:57 | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |