| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel Apply |
| Date: | 2025-09-06 03:40:29 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+LUDOEanjXx9btefYPrmKJi+kqZPW3Fm6Oj20N-ysBrw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 5:15 PM Mihail Nikalayeu
<mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hello, Amit!
>
> Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> > So, in such cases as we won't be able to detect
> > transaction dependencies, it would be better to allow out-of-order
> > commits optionally.
>
> I think it is better to enable preserve order by default - for safety reasons.
>
+1.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2025-09-06 03:43:49 | Re: Improve pg_sync_replication_slots() to wait for primary to advance |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-09-06 01:38:35 | Re: [PATCH] Update parser README to include parse_jsontable.c |