| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: logical_replication_mode |
| Date: | 2023-08-25 04:28:13 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+GVizVp3qiBt0OP3BxNBWAOu6VFZh4e8=4bGkUEnH4ZA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 12:45 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>
> I suggest we rename this setting to something starting with debug_.
> Right now, the name looks much too tempting for users to fiddle with. I
> think this is similar to force_parallel_mode.
>
+1. How about debug_logical_replication?
> Also, the descriptions in guc_tables.c could be improved. For example,
>
> gettext_noop("Controls when to replicate or apply each change."),
>
> is pretty content-free and unhelpful.
>
The other possibility I could think of is to change short_desc as:
"Allows to replicate each change for large transactions.". Do you have
any better ideas?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Imseih (AWS), Sami | 2023-08-25 04:29:53 | Re: False "pg_serial": apparent wraparound” in logs |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2023-08-25 04:26:47 | Re: psql --no-connect option |