From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |
Date: | 2020-09-30 09:06:24 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+6wvs8zP-crCOXP2qn6jybqTXm9BH0F9V889sxoCL-Og@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 8:04 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I have started looking into you latest patches, as of now I have a
> few comments.
>
> v6-0001
>
> @@ -1987,7 +2072,7 @@ ReorderBufferProcessTXN(ReorderBuffer *rb,
> ReorderBufferTXN *txn,
> prev_lsn = change->lsn;
>
> /* Set the current xid to detect concurrent aborts. */
> - if (streaming)
> + if (streaming || rbtxn_prepared(change->txn))
> {
> curtxn = change->txn;
> SetupCheckXidLive(curtxn->xid);
> @@ -2249,7 +2334,6 @@ ReorderBufferProcessTXN(ReorderBuffer *rb,
> ReorderBufferTXN *txn,
> break;
> }
> }
> -
>
> For streaming transaction we need to check the xid everytime because
> there could concurrent a subtransaction abort, but
> for two-phase we don't need to call SetupCheckXidLive everytime,
> because we are sure that transaction is going to be
> the same throughout the processing.
>
While decoding transactions at 'prepare' time there could be multiple
sub-transactions like in the case below. Won't that be impacted if we
follow your suggestion here?
postgres=# Begin;
BEGIN
postgres=*# insert into t1 values(1,'aaa');
INSERT 0 1
postgres=*# savepoint s1;
SAVEPOINT
postgres=*# insert into t1 values(2,'aaa');
INSERT 0 1
postgres=*# savepoint s2;
SAVEPOINT
postgres=*# insert into t1 values(3,'aaa');
INSERT 0 1
postgres=*# Prepare Transaction 'foo';
PREPARE TRANSACTION
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-09-30 09:10:10 | Re: [DOC] Document concurrent index builds waiting on each other |
Previous Message | Andrey V. Lepikhov | 2020-09-30 08:48:12 | Re: Adding Support for Copy callback functionality on COPY TO api |