Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera from 2ndQuadrant <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks
Date: 2019-09-13 04:29:40
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+5=5dqNS=S1DcEOsMiuWQz3+kMgEL8x-S60irZuAcm7A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 9:00 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 05:24:17PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:48 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> > Hmm, I thought when decode_combined flag is set to false means we will
> > display the raw flags set on the tuple without any further
> > interpretation. I think that is what is most people in thread
> > advocated about.
>
> Sorry if I created any confusion. When set to false then the raw list
> of flags is returned, and that's the default.
>

I think that is what we have not done in one of the cases pointed by me.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-09-13 04:30:07 Re: refactoring - share str2*int64 functions
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2019-09-13 04:22:05 Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)