Re: Conflict detection and logging in logical replication

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Conflict detection and logging in logical replication
Date: 2024-08-22 08:51:42
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+3JUJu81sSZ=k5aZp4H2XWp3QVe5EngXhS3bEoTwN32g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 1:33 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Do you think the documentation for the 'column_value' parameter of the
> conflict logging should say that the displayed value might be
> truncated?
>

I updated the patch to mention this and pushed it.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Harris 2024-08-22 08:52:30 Re: ANALYZE ONLY
Previous Message 陈宗志 2024-08-22 08:50:16 Re: Some questions about PostgreSQL’s design.