On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 6:21 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> We previously discussed the append_tuple_value_detail case [1], and
> I opined that the right fix was to change things so that what that
> function produces is a string that doesn't need translation because
> it matches SQL syntax for a row constructor. It doesn't look like
> that's happened yet.
>
I'll look into your suggestions.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.