Re: [HACKERS][PATCH] adding simple sock check for windows

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: CharSyam <charsyam(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS][PATCH] adding simple sock check for windows
Date: 2018-03-31 06:17:47
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+1oyxiFsyD-rFzCizCaY=F8K-D76A_PPwVO9131H3kow@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 11:42 AM, CharSyam <charsyam(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi, Amit, It's good question. I also thought about it.
>
> But, I want to leave original code intention.
>
> Actually I think there is no case ( slot->sock is not PGINVALID_SOCKET
> and slot->sock < 0)
>
> but if original code want to check (sock < -1)
>

If you see the code of PQsocket, then that won't be possible.

> I think it is better to leave that condition.
>
> but I think slot->sock == PGINVALID_SOCKET is enough
>

It is up to you, but I don't see any reason to retain the old check.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message CharSyam 2018-03-31 06:35:04 Re: [HACKERS][PATCH] adding simple sock check for windows
Previous Message CharSyam 2018-03-31 06:12:46 Re: [HACKERS][PATCH] adding simple sock check for windows