Re: Doc chapter for Hash Indexes

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Doc chapter for Hash Indexes
Date: 2021-06-23 04:12:16
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+1c+yH3WpOhKdN4r4ccMbHJ7LzXdE4QvX6gm0iOpzoTQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 2:31 PM Simon Riggs
<simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I attach both clean and compare versions.
>

Do we want to hold this work for PG15 or commit in PG14 and backpatch
it till v10 where we have made hash indexes crash-safe? I would vote
for committing in PG14 and backpatch it till v10, however, I am fine
if we want to commit just to PG14 or PG15.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com 2021-06-23 04:16:10 Partition Check not updated when insert into a partition
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-06-23 04:07:11 Re: Assertion failure in HEAD and 13 after calling COMMIT in a stored proc