| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: range test for hash index? |
| Date: | 2019-09-27 04:18:07 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+1Oh+BGGtd5SbhDo2Rx1TjGbYeE4eupjj+D5Zc4x3QtA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 6:02 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 4:03 AM Tomas Vondra
> <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > By "inconsistent" you mean that pre-10 versions will have different
> > expected output than versions with WAL-logged hash indexes?
> >
>
> Yes.
>
> > I don't see
> > why that would be a reason not to backpatch to all supported versions,
> > considering we already have the same difference for other test suites.
> >
>
> Yeah, I also think so. I will do this today.
>
Pushed.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Paul Guo | 2019-09-27 04:18:31 | Re: Batch insert in CTAS/MatView code |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2019-09-27 04:13:02 | Re: dropdb --force |