From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: logical replication worker accesses catalogs in error context callback |
Date: | 2021-02-04 12:12:47 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+=ofRSWzDtm781mVWEYAM_Dt2RVBC2BnvcO0yP-+vZNQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 5:38 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 4:00 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > > About 0001, have we tried to reproduce the actual bug here which means
> > > > when the error_callback is called we should face some problem? I feel
> > > > with the correct testcase we should hit the Assert
> > > > (Assert(IsTransactionState());) in SearchCatCacheInternal because
> > > > there we expect the transaction to be in a valid state. I understand
> > > > that the transaction is in a broken state at that time but having a
> > > > testcase to hit the actual bug makes it easy to test the fix.
> > >
> > > I have not tried hitting the Assert(IsTransactionState() in
> > > SearchCatCacheInternal. To do that, I need to figure out hitting
> > > "incorrect binary data format in logical replication column" error in
> > > either slot_modify_data or slot_store_data so that we will enter the
> > > error callback slot_store_error_callback and then IsTransactionState()
> > > should return false i.e. txn shouldn't be in TRANS_INPROGRESS.
> > >
> >
> > Even, if you hit that via debugger it will be sufficient or you can
> > write another elog/ereport there to achieve the same. The exact test
> > case to hit that error is not mandatory.
>
> Thanks Amit. I verified it with gdb. I attached gdb to the logical
> replication worker. In slot_store_data's for loop, I intentionally set
> CurrentTransactionState->state = TRANS_DEFAULT,
>
What happens if you don't change CurrentTransactionState->state?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2021-02-04 12:35:41 | Re: Is MaxHeapAttributeNumber a reasonable restriction for foreign-tables? |
Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2021-02-04 12:08:39 | Re: logical replication worker accesses catalogs in error context callback |