| From: | Neil Chen <carpenter(dot)nail(dot)cz(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fix how some lists are displayed by psql \d+ |
| Date: | 2026-01-09 01:19:28 |
| Message-ID: | CAA3qoJn8v_sS77oztebjGiW123=vBa5T1RMrN_vbAaC5N=FLcQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Peter,
On Fri, Jan 9, 2026 at 6:47 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I recently saw that the psql \d+ lists for "Partitions:" are not
> aligned in quite the same way as other lists ("Publications:" etc)
> because they use indents and line breaks differently. e.g. See below:
>
> PSA v1
> 0001 - Fix (common code) lists for "Partitions:" and "Child tables:"
> 0002 - Fix list for "Inherits:" in the same way
>
>
This patch looks good to me.
However, referring to the original code implementation, I believe the
initial design intention for the psql display was to make it as "compact"
as possible.
I'm not sure.. if it's worthwhile to uniformly change the display style of
other items you mentioned (such as Publications) to the compact style?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Xuneng Zhou | 2026-01-09 01:32:01 | Re: Optimize SnapBuildPurgeOlderTxn: use in-place compaction instead of temporary array |
| Previous Message | Chao Li | 2026-01-09 00:56:00 | Re: Use IsA() macro instead of nodeTag comparison |