Hi zengman,
On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 10:37 PM zengman <zengman(at)halodbtech(dot)com> wrote:
>
> This indicates that for the test case at offnum == 36, the error message
> should report "offset 43" (the successor), not "offset 36" (the current
> tuple).
> However, when I updated the test expectation from \d+ wildcard to the
> exact value offset 43, the test fails.
> This makes me wonder whether the current code in verify_heapam.c (lines
> 777, 793, 799) should be using nextoffnum instead of ctx.offnum.
>
>
Fully agreed.
I think there's no need to modify the expectations. Seems the 0002 patch
alone is sufficient.