Re: Rule Question

From: Andrew Bartley <ambartley(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rule Question
Date: 2013-07-25 21:15:09
Message-ID: CAA3RN+ziCLKirZDaVvFD=P7WvN66fdVvm5n6_ubnvm8dJM+f6A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks All,

And thanks Tom, I did not realise a rule worked in that manner. Will now
take that into account in the future.

Thanks

Andrew

On 26 July 2013 02:02, Giuseppe Broccolo
<giuseppe(dot)broccolo(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>wrote:

>
> Unrelated to the OP's question, the suggestion above could be more simply
>> rewritten as
>>
>> TG_OP = 'UPDATE'
>> AND NEW.b IS DISTINCT FROM OLD.b
>>
> You're right! :)
>
>
> Giuseppe.
>
> --
> Giuseppe Broccolo - 2ndQuadrant Italy
> PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
> giuseppe(dot)broccolo(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)**it | www.2ndQuadrant.it
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/**mailpref/pgsql-general<http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sébastien Lorion 2013-07-25 21:17:00 Re: Why are stored procedures looked on so negatively?
Previous Message Giuseppe Broccolo 2013-07-25 16:02:52 Re: Rule Question