Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc

From: salvador fandino <sfandino(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc
Date: 2016-03-01 14:08:14
Message-ID: CAA2CF7VZ8SR+u2FRsoE77NdKmWHn5Q4wt-J9_72md1UwYuHEgA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

>
> Hi all
>
> I've been working with the new TAP tests for recovery and have a number of
> enhancements I'd like to make to the tooling to make writing tests easier
> and nicer. I've also included two improvements proposed by Kyotaro
> HORIGUCHI in the prior thread about the now-committed TAP recovery tests.
>
> I developed these changes as part of testing failover slots and logical
> decoding timeline following, where I found a need for better control over
> psql, the ability to make filesystem level backups, etc. It doesn't make
> sense to try to jam all that into my test script when it belongs in the
> infrastructure.
>
> Patches attached, each explains what it does and what for.
>

You are using both "die_on_error" and "on_error_die" in your code. That
looks like a mismatch!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2016-03-01 14:09:09 Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2016-03-01 14:06:38 Re: Timeline following for logical slots