| From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Triggers with DO functionality |
| Date: | 2012-02-17 16:44:11 |
| Message-ID: | CAA-aLv7weqXK9oEmx=4AJ8n6Gq2=s+rDK9Lpn7WnGuO5b72fLQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 17 February 2012 16:29, David E. Wheeler <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> wrote:
> On Feb 17, 2012, at 5:22 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
>
>> The purpose being to only have a single statement to set up the
>> trigger rather than setting up a separate trigger function which will
>> unlikely be re-used by other triggers... or is this of dubious
>> benefit?
>
> +1, though I imagine it would just give it a generated name and save it anyway, eh?
I had thought about that, yes, but I didn't want to get bogged down in
implementation.
--
Thom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thom Brown | 2012-02-17 16:46:48 | Re: Triggers with DO functionality |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2012-02-17 16:43:53 | Re: Triggers with DO functionality |