From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: chkpass_in should not be volatile |
Date: | 2016-06-03 14:41:51 |
Message-ID: | CAA-aLv75MiNgS-1c0L_NQfBMMigcrubDWbETOXnV2xZm6K1WjA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3 June 2016 at 15:26, David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>> Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> writes:
>> > ...or at least according to the warning message:
>> > postgres=# CREATE EXTENSION chkpass ;
>> > WARNING: type input function chkpass_in should not be volatile
>>
>> See thread here:
>>
>>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CACfv%2BpL2oX08SSZSoaHpyC%3DUbfTFmPt4UmVEKJTH7y%3D2QMRCBw%40mail.gmail.com
>>
>> Given the lack of complaints so far, maybe we could think about redefining
>> the behavior of chkpass_in. I'm not very sure to what, though.
>>
>
> Thom, how did you end up encountering this?
>
I built the extension and tried to create it. Not really anything other
than that.
Thom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-06-03 14:44:49 | Re: chkpass_in should not be volatile |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2016-06-03 14:32:24 | Re: pg9.6 segfault using simple query (related to use fk for join estimates) |