| From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction |
| Date: | 2014-11-11 09:29:22 |
| Message-ID: | CAA-aLv7+9WoEH123STuoSpg9GU5QMraqTueTwy5Cg4XbwD3wXQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 26 September 2014 12:40, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > But this gets at another point: the way we're benchmarking this right
> > now, we're really conflating the effects of three different things:
> >
> > 1. Changing the locking regimen around the freelist and clocksweep.
> > 2. Adding a bgreclaimer process.
> > 3. Raising the number of buffer locking partitions.
>
> First of all thanks for committing part-1 of this changes and it
> seems you are planing to commit part-3 based on results of tests
> which Andres is planing to do and for remaining part (part-2), today
>
Were parts 2 and 3 committed in the end?
--
Thom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-11-11 09:30:55 | Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-11-11 09:27:43 | Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes |