| From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Date: | 2011-09-23 01:26:53 |
| Message-ID: | CAA-aLv6cbYw34C7y5O29b1oxSCGCPTacPTq26J81Oa2T88hdkQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On 22 September 2011 17:38, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> So are there any plans to allow swappable drive/volatile storage
>> unlogged tables?
>
> Be our guest. ;-)
Oh it can't be that difficult. On first glance it looks like it's a
case of piggy-backing mdopen and getting it to treat
RELPERSISTENCE_TEMP relations in the same way as it would for
relations during the bootstrap script (i.e. create it if it doesn't
exist)... then telling it not to try reading anything from the
relation... or something like this. But I don't know C so...
*puppy-dog eyes*
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-09-23 14:12:39 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-09-22 20:57:50 | Wikipedia's Isolation page |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2011-09-23 04:26:41 | Re: patch: plpgsql - remove unnecessary ccache search when a array variable is updated |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-09-23 01:11:54 | Re: memory barriers (was: Yes, WaitLatch is vulnerable to weak-memory-ordering bugs) |