Re: Minmax indexes

From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Minmax indexes
Date: 2014-01-24 17:09:49
Message-ID: CAA-aLv67qNhB1sYcm-x1kY0q-Bw3nOvv8SZ+jZXi622KhGB1bA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8 November 2013 20:11, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Erik Rijkers wrote:
>> On Thu, September 26, 2013 00:34, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>> > On Wed, September 25, 2013 22:34, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> >
>> >> [minmax-5.patch]
>> >
>> > I have the impression it's not quite working correctly.
>
> Here's a version 7 of the patch, which fixes these bugs and adds
> opclasses for a bunch more types (timestamp, timestamptz, date, time,
> timetz), courtesy of Martín Marqués. It's also been rebased to apply
> cleanly on top of today's master branch.
>
> I have also added a selectivity function, but I'm not positive that it's
> very useful yet.

This patch doesn't appear to have been submitted to any Commitfest.
Is this still a feature undergoing research then?

--
Thom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-01-24 17:10:50 Re: Changeset Extraction v7.1
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-01-24 16:28:18 Re: Changeset Extraction v7.1