Re: Primary not sending to synchronous standby

From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Primary not sending to synchronous standby
Date: 2015-02-23 15:48:25
Message-ID: CAA-aLv5r1w1N80oN1GU4rihzU3vOrCmTu=Ty1M9LxOZFbWJjiQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 23 February 2015 at 15:42, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On 2015-02-23 16:38:44 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I unfortunately don't remember enough of the thread to reference it
> > here.
>
> Found the right keywords. The threads below
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/369698E947874884A77849D8FE3680C2%40maumau
> and
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5CF4ABBA67674088B3941894E22A0D25@maumau
>

Yes, this seems to be virtually the same issue reported. The trace looks
the same except for RecordTransactionCommit.

--
Thom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2015-02-23 15:59:18 Re: Auditing extension for PostgreSQL (Take 2)
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-02-23 15:47:39 Re: [RFC] Should smgrtruncate() avoid sending sinval message for temp relations