Re: Declarative partitioning

From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning
Date: 2015-10-20 17:26:36
Message-ID: CAA-aLv5RKYh=D1BL3WB=DrvsOAEbPn5trZkBiBVQ9TjO=xCJPw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 18 August 2015 at 12:23, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi Thom,
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Wow, didn't expect to see that email this morning.
>>
>> A very quick test:
>>
>> CREATE TABLE purchases (purchase_id serial, purchase_time timestamp, item
>> text) partition by range on ((extract(year from
>> purchase_time)),(extract(month from purchase_time)));
>> ERROR: referenced relation "purchases" is not a table or foreign table
>>
>
> Thanks for the quick test.
>
> Damn, I somehow missed adding the new relkind to a check in
> process_owned_by(). Will fix this and look for any such oversights.

This doesn't seem to have materialised. Are you still working on this?

Thom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2015-10-20 17:34:09 Re: Declarative partitioning
Previous Message David Fetter 2015-10-20 17:21:13 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Tab complete CREATE EXTENSION .. VERSION.