Re: Cascaded standby message

On 7 September 2011 11:56, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >> Fujii - the original goal here was to avoid having a unexplained
> >> disconnection in the logs. The only way to do this cleanly is to have
> >> a disconnection reason passed to the walsender, rather than just a
> >> blind signal. Looks like we need to multiplex or other mechanism.
> >
> > That's an idea. But what about the patch that I proposed before?
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-08/msg00816.php
>
> Thanks for that. Committed.
> <http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers>
>

This appears to be the patch submitted to the commitfest.
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=630 Can this now be
marked as committed?

--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company