From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Error with index on unlogged table |
Date: | 2015-03-25 12:46:03 |
Message-ID: | CAA-aLv4VDaio6CPy1w_U3LJZEPKxS6pZXpXsqzVn7g34gAQXXw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 25 March 2015 at 12:22, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
> > > The index is unlogged until reindexing...
> > >
> > > [...]
> > > Which is think also raises the question, why are unlogged indexes made
> > > persistent by a reindex?
> >
> > That's a bug of HEAD, ~9.4 keeping the index as unlogged even after
> > REINDEX INDEX. What happens is that ReindexIndex relies on
> > relpersistence provided by makeRangeVar at parse time, which is just
> > incorrect as it uses RELPERSISTENCE_PERMANENT all the time. The patch
> > attached fixes that...
> >
>
> How about VACUUM FULL and CLUSTER as the problem seems to have been
> reported to be there too?
No, those are okay. They actually revert the index back to the same
persistence level as the table they're attached to.
--
Thom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-03-25 13:12:41 | Re: printing table in asciidoc with psql |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-03-25 12:37:08 | Re: printing table in asciidoc with psql |