Re: [PATCH] Rename "getdatabaseencoding()" to "pg_database_encoding()", and document

From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Rename "getdatabaseencoding()" to "pg_database_encoding()", and document
Date: 2026-07-17 08:26:39
Message-ID: CAA-aLv4EaKygRp5pRFgNK6wRJ+u=zx5BrTQhrVa_QZoO_nr2-A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 17 Jul 2026, 08:24 Daniel Gustafsson, <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:

> > On 17 Jul 2026, at 08:44, Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> > It was noted here [1] that we have the undocumented SQL function
> > "getdatabaseencoding()", used mainly in regression tests and a couple
> > of psql queries. While considering a documentation patch, it occurred
> > to me that it's a horrible function name which doesn't look like other
> > public functions, and we already have "pg_client_encoding()", so why not
> > rename it to match that while we're at it?
>
> This function seems to be referred to in extensions, how about adding
> keeping
> the existin name and adding the new name as an alias? It would keep
> existing
> code from breaking and cause less churn in the code.
>

Why don't extensions use current_setting('server_encoding')?

Thom

>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2026-07-17 08:28:24 Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread
Previous Message wenhui qiu 2026-07-17 08:17:02 Re: PGLZ Compression Optimization