| From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Rename "getdatabaseencoding()" to "pg_database_encoding()", and document |
| Date: | 2026-07-17 08:26:39 |
| Message-ID: | CAA-aLv4EaKygRp5pRFgNK6wRJ+u=zx5BrTQhrVa_QZoO_nr2-A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 17 Jul 2026, 08:24 Daniel Gustafsson, <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> > On 17 Jul 2026, at 08:44, Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> > It was noted here [1] that we have the undocumented SQL function
> > "getdatabaseencoding()", used mainly in regression tests and a couple
> > of psql queries. While considering a documentation patch, it occurred
> > to me that it's a horrible function name which doesn't look like other
> > public functions, and we already have "pg_client_encoding()", so why not
> > rename it to match that while we're at it?
>
> This function seems to be referred to in extensions, how about adding
> keeping
> the existin name and adding the new name as an alias? It would keep
> existing
> code from breaking and cause less churn in the code.
>
Why don't extensions use current_setting('server_encoding')?
Thom
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2026-07-17 08:28:24 | Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread |
| Previous Message | wenhui qiu | 2026-07-17 08:17:02 | Re: PGLZ Compression Optimization |