Re: bt_index_parent_check and concurrently build indexes

From: Donghang Lin <donghanglin(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
Cc: Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrey Borodin <amborodin86(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: bt_index_parent_check and concurrently build indexes
Date: 2025-12-21 16:18:28
Message-ID: CAA=D8a0M3pMdSwwYpobU_noGK=GDxrfOP894OVn9qN+aSF2BiQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Álvaro,

> > I think we'll have another chance to reflect that the issue is since
> > 7f563c09f890 but not 5ae2087202af in master for this fix. I can give
> > it a try.
>
> Go ahead.
>

Attach the fix for the inaccurate comment in master.

Thanks,
Donghang

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Fix-the-comment-for-snapshot-field-BtreeCheckState.patch application/octet-stream 1.2 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuya Kawata 2025-12-21 17:08:42 Re: [PATCH] Add memory usage reporting to VACUUM VERBOSE
Previous Message vignesh C 2025-12-21 15:46:33 Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication