| From: | Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges? |
| Date: | 2018-11-24 02:55:54 |
| Message-ID: | CA+renyWczNa5TBprqpqQzL=Mx4CSmgsBaZOwz2MgrqjT9+YN+Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 3:41 PM Paul A Jungwirth
<pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> wrote:
> Here is a patch for my progress on this so far.
Well this is embarrassing, but my last patch used the mistaken syntax
`PRIMARY KEY (cols, WITHOUT OVERLAPS col)`. Here is a new patch which
uses the correct syntax `PRIMARY KEY (cols, col WITHOUT OVERLAPS)`.
Sorry about that! Also I went ahead and rebased it off current master.
Yours,
Paul
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| temporal_pks_v0002.patch | application/octet-stream | 27.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Edmund Horner | 2018-11-24 05:20:25 | Re: Tid scan improvements |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-11-24 02:46:17 | Re: Tid scan improvements |