Re: Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?
Date: 2019-03-05 08:35:13
Message-ID: 115d51ec-1803-11ce-92a0-1082cc64fbc7@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Paul,

On 11/24/18 4:55 AM, Paul A Jungwirth wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 3:41 PM Paul A Jungwirth
> <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> wrote:
>> Here is a patch for my progress on this so far.
>
> Well this is embarrassing, but my last patch used the mistaken syntax
> `PRIMARY KEY (cols, WITHOUT OVERLAPS col)`. Here is a new patch which
> uses the correct syntax `PRIMARY KEY (cols, col WITHOUT OVERLAPS)`.
> Sorry about that! Also I went ahead and rebased it off current master.

I have marked this patch as targeting PG13 since it is clearly not
material for PG12. I also added you as the patch author.

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message yuzuko 2019-03-05 08:35:59 Re: Problem with default partition pruning
Previous Message David Steele 2019-03-05 08:29:42 Re: Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor