| From: | Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zhijie Hou <houzhijie22(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, kedar anavardekar <kedar(dot)anavardekar(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fix WITHOUT OVERLAPS multirange with location replication |
| Date: | 2026-10-15 18:49:58 |
| Message-ID: | CA+renyWDQRyRbQwe-MZETBCmSB+Z4BfeNdpP7=uNcsUkUdMfUQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 5:16 AM Zhijie Hou <houzhijie22(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, but keeping RI FULL also doesn't harm; rather it tests something
> > extra which is that it can extract required values from the full
> > tuple. So, I am okay either way. I have modified the comments at
> > multiple places in the patch as I find there is a lot of redundancy in
> > the comments. See attached top-up patch. BTW, we need a separate patch
> > for v18 as well.
>
> Thanks for the diff. I have merged and prepared the patches for
> back branches as well.
Thanks! These all apply and look good to me. I'll mark the CF entry as
Ready for Committer.
Yours,
--
Paul ~{:-)
pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Jones | 2026-10-15 18:52:53 | Reject COPY TO of unlogged relations during recovery |
| Previous Message | Baji Shaik | 2026-10-15 18:35:59 | [PATCH] Doc fix for autovacuum_max_parallel_workers |