|From:||Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|To:||Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com, i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru|
|Subject:||Re: Changing the autovacuum launcher scheduling; oldest table first algorithm|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox|
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 3:05 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:48 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 06:21:34PM +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> > > Nothing changed since then, but also the patch got not enough review to say
> > > that there was substantial feedback. I'll move it to the next CF.
> > I would have suggested to mark the patch as returned with feedback
> > instead as the thing does not apply for some time now, and the author
> > has been notified about a rebase.
> Agreed and sorry for the late reply.
> The design of this patch would need to be reconsidered based on
> suggestions and discussions we had before. I'll propose it again after
Well, taking into account this information, then yes, it makes sense and I'll
mark it as "Returned with feedback", thanks!
|Next Message||Etsuro Fujita||2018-11-30 09:51:29||Re: postgres_fdw: oddity in costing aggregate pushdown paths|
|Previous Message||Michael Paquier||2018-11-30 08:54:15||Re: [Todo item] Add entry creation timestamp column to pg_stat_replication|