Re: Changing the autovacuum launcher scheduling; oldest table first algorithm

From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com, i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru
Subject: Re: Changing the autovacuum launcher scheduling; oldest table first algorithm
Date: 2018-11-30 09:40:09
Message-ID: CA+q6zcW5s4X0npkoBhHCmWQwRPCRnkNpnZq_q1MNEHcDCn2xpg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 3:05 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:48 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 06:21:34PM +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> > > Nothing changed since then, but also the patch got not enough review to say
> > > that there was substantial feedback. I'll move it to the next CF.
> >
> > I would have suggested to mark the patch as returned with feedback
> > instead as the thing does not apply for some time now, and the author
> > has been notified about a rebase.
>
> Agreed and sorry for the late reply.
>
> The design of this patch would need to be reconsidered based on
> suggestions and discussions we had before. I'll propose it again after
> considerations.

Well, taking into account this information, then yes, it makes sense and I'll
mark it as "Returned with feedback", thanks!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2018-11-30 09:51:29 Re: postgres_fdw: oddity in costing aggregate pushdown paths
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-11-30 08:54:15 Re: [Todo item] Add entry creation timestamp column to pg_stat_replication