From: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: Displaying and dumping of table access methods |
Date: | 2019-01-09 09:01:44 |
Message-ID: | CA+q6zcVfjADzYbjv5PndNxN+=4PvZw_7C_p606ZWBbNUO_21zg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 6:34 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> On 2019-01-08 11:30:56 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 08/01/2019 00:56, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > A patch at [2] adds display of a table's access method to \d+ - but that
> > > means that running the tests with a different default table access
> > > method (e.g. using PGOPTIONS='-c default_table_access_method=...)
> > > there'll be a significant number of test failures, even though the test
> > > results did not meaningfully differ.
> >
> > For psql, a variable that hides the access method if it's the default.
>
> Yea, I think that seems the least contentious solution. Don't like it
> too much, but it seems better than the alternative. I wonder if we want
> one for multiple regression related issues, or whether one specifically
> about table AMs is more appropriate. I lean towards the latter.
Are there any similar existing regression related issues? If no, then probably
the latter indeed makes more sense.
> > > Similarly, if pg_dump starts to dump table access methods either
> > > unconditionally, or for all non-heap AMS, the pg_dump tests fail due to
> > > unimportant differences.
> >
> > For pg_dump, track and set the default_table_access_method setting
> > throughout the dump (similar to how default_with_oids was handled, I
> > believe).
>
> Yea, that's similar to that, and I think that makes sense.
Yes, sounds like a reasonable approach, I can proceed with it.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mi Tar | 2019-01-09 09:05:20 | Re: port of INSTALL file generation to XSLT |
Previous Message | Higuchi, Daisuke | 2019-01-09 08:41:53 | RE: Problem during Windows service start |