| From: | Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Federico Di Gregorio <fog(at)dndg(dot)it> |
| Cc: | Giovanni Mascellani <mascellani(at)poisson(dot)phc(dot)unipi(dot)it>, psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Use lo_creat() when possible instead of lo_create() |
| Date: | 2012-01-10 11:18:23 |
| Message-ID: | CA+mi_8Z6RcuYetzTHBZV5fJqo6XCeSr=ao13M4G6XjDZiKFDfw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | psycopg |
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Federico Di Gregorio <fog(at)dndg(dot)it> wrote:
> On 10/01/12 09:51, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
>>
>> I just created a ticket against psycopg2, and Daniele asked me to bring
>> the issue on the list to open it to a wider audience. The ticket is here:
>>
>>
>> http://psycopg.lighthouseapp.com/projects/62710/tickets/88-use-lo_creat-when-possible-instead-of-lo_create
>
>
> The patch seems fine to me. Doesn't add any overhead and improves
> compatibility with an existing product. I vote +1 [that means "unless
> Daniele votes -1 I'll include it" ;)]
I don't know much about the difference between the two functions: if
anybody has any interesting story about them I'd be happy to know.
Meanwhile I'll make sure we have tests for both the code paths in the
patch.
-- Daniele
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniele Varrazzo | 2012-01-10 21:57:44 | Re: Use lo_creat() when possible instead of lo_create() |
| Previous Message | Federico Di Gregorio | 2012-01-10 10:06:34 | Re: Use lo_creat() when possible instead of lo_create() |