| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: Bloom index cost model seems to be wrong |
| Date: | 2019-07-07 23:57:37 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGLxYST2cu28oiS_FRZKg8E4JrOVVHO19rx0AoKWxHXi2Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 7:11 AM Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm adding it to the commitfest targeting v13. I'm more interested in feedback on the conceptual issues rather than stylistic ones, as I would probably merge the two functions together before proposing something to actually be committed.
From the trivialities department, this patch shows up as a CI failure
with -Werror, because there is no declaration for
genericcostestimate2(). I realise that's just a temporary name in a
WIP patch anyway so this isn't useful feedback, but for the benefit of
anyone going through CI failures in bulk looking for things to
complain about: this isn't a real one.
--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2019-07-08 00:37:08 | Re: Built-in connection pooler |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2019-07-07 23:23:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2019-07-08 00:26:23 | Re: UUID v1 optimizations... |
| Previous Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2019-07-07 14:33:00 | Re: Optimizing `WHERE x IN` query |