| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Reducing WaitEventSet syscall churn |
| Date: | 2021-02-27 01:48:25 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGKJd6M6Z4qdge=ToanOZL5-XRAf6YFiUJ9=s-GcTYjHyw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 6:10 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> For point 2, the question I am raising is: why should users get a
> special FATAL message in some places and not others, for PM death?
> However, if people are attached to that behaviour, we could still
> achieve goal 1 without goal 2 by handling PM death explicitly in
> walsender.c and I'd be happy to post an alternative patch set like
> that.
Here's the alternative patch set, with no change to existing error
message behaviour. I'm going to commit this version and close this CF
item soon if there are no objections.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v8-0001-Introduce-symbolic-names-for-FeBeWaitSet-position.patch | text/x-patch | 4.1 KB |
| v8-0002-Use-FeBeWaitSet-for-walsender.c.patch | text/x-patch | 4.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Smith | 2021-02-27 02:01:21 | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |
| Previous Message | Euler Taveira | 2021-02-27 01:35:13 | Re: row filtering for logical replication |