Re: [PATCH] add relation and block-level filtering to pg_waldump

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: David Christensen <david(dot)christensen(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add relation and block-level filtering to pg_waldump
Date: 2022-03-24 11:26:43
Message-ID: CA+hUKG+h-1qbQS0w0ARR73gw+Mv1fcxVZaFMycQS3JGc8iZiZA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:01 AM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Or even: Why are we exposing fork *numbers* in the user interface?
> Even low-level tools such as pageinspect use fork *names* in their
> interface.

I wondered about that but thought it seemed OK for such a low level
tool. It's a fair point though, especially if other low level tools
are doing that. Here's a patch to change it.

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Use-fork-names-not-numbers-in-pg_waldump-option.patch text/x-patch 3.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jesper Pedersen 2022-03-24 11:32:14 Re: MDAM techniques and Index Skip Scan patch
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2022-03-24 11:01:47 Re: [PATCH] add relation and block-level filtering to pg_waldump