Re: Remove "Source Code" column from \df+ ?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Remove "Source Code" column from \df+ ?
Date: 2016-11-08 21:32:42
Message-ID: CA+TgmobrVnH3ioU31tHb83HLFd1qHse6uha=m7dihaCYNZXkxw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> There is still an open CommitFest entry for this patch, which is
>> marked "Ready for Committer", but it looks to me like there's no
>> consensus position here. Different people have different preferences,
>> and every option that is somebody's first preference seems to be
>> somebody else's last preference. So I suggest that we give this one
>> up for a lost cause and mark it Rejected.
>
> Yeah, that's about where I'm at on it too.

Done. We can reopen this if a vigorous consensus emerges.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2016-11-08 21:51:46 SERIALIZABLE with parallel query
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-11-08 21:31:51 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCH] Tab completion for ALTER TYPE … RENAME VALUE …