Re: Remove "Source Code" column from \df+ ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Remove "Source Code" column from \df+ ?
Date: 2016-11-08 21:18:08
Message-ID: 5654.1478639888@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> There is still an open CommitFest entry for this patch, which is
> marked "Ready for Committer", but it looks to me like there's no
> consensus position here. Different people have different preferences,
> and every option that is somebody's first preference seems to be
> somebody else's last preference. So I suggest that we give this one
> up for a lost cause and mark it Rejected.

Yeah, that's about where I'm at on it too.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-11-08 21:31:51 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCH] Tab completion for ALTER TYPE … RENAME VALUE …
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-11-08 21:07:23 Re: Remove "Source Code" column from \df+ ?