Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 9.2 release schedule

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.2 release schedule
Date: 2012-07-23 14:12:19
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> It looks like the most optimistic schedule we could possibly make,
> assuming no show-stopper bugs are reported, is:
> * Wrap beta3 on August 2 for release Monday Aug 6
> * RC1 two weeks later (release Aug 20)
> * 9.2.0 two weeks after that (release Sept 3)
> Now that schedule isn't actually going to work so far as the USA
> contingent is concerned, because Sept 3 is Labor Day.  But we could
> figure that there's room for one week's slip in there, either for
> RC1 or final, giving us a release date of Sept 10.
> Again, this is assuming no major bugs are found to force more slippage
> or additional betas/RCs.  But I think it's reasonable to shoot for
> If All Goes Well.
> Comments, objections?

Seems OK, but I think we need to work a little harder on evicting some
things from the list of open items.  I don't think all of the things
listed in the blockers section really are, and I'm not sure what needs
to be done about some of the things that are there.

Robert Haas
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-07-23 14:17:39
Subject: Re: [PATCH] XLogReader v2
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-07-23 14:08:46
Subject: Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group