Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers
Date: 2012-07-23 14:08:46
Message-ID: CA+TgmobyoSgNuV3dp-GDcGWjwxgRwTP5qnMOz7H7jLhE7s3mgQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:24:21AM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On fre, 2012-07-20 at 13:11 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > I think the commands to run after pg_upgrade --link completes on both
>> > primary and standby might be as easy as:
>> >
>> > cd /u/pg/pgsql.old/data
>> > find . -links 1 -exec cp {} /u/pgsql/data \;
>> >
>> > Why would we want anything more complicated than this?
>>
>> In practice these are on different machines, and the way the machines
>> are connected could vary wildly. So an automated solution might be
>> difficult to find.
>
> Yeah, I was thinking of just suggesting scp as a doc example and let
> users adjust that:
>
> cd /u/pg/pgsql.old/data
> find . -links 1 -exec scp {} postgres(at)momjian(dot)us:/u/pgsql/data \;

Relying on the number of hard links seems very fragile. For example,
it'll break if you are using copy mode. And it won't work on Windows,
either.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-07-23 14:12:19 Re: 9.2 release schedule
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2012-07-23 13:58:47 Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)