Re: abi-compliance-checker

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: abi-compliance-checker
Date: 2024-03-14 14:38:33
Message-ID: CA+TgmobTfb-UEEFtV3kc6BhpwFTGyBwZ8=TG5a4xmdh25VYVzA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 7:50 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> Looking at this again, if we don't want the .xml files in the tree, then
> we don't really need this patch series.

Based on this, I've updated the status of this patch in the CommitFest
application to Withdrawn. If that's not correct, please feel free to
adjust.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-03-14 14:38:53 Re: Built-in CTYPE provider
Previous Message Robert Haas 2024-03-14 14:36:39 Re: Should we remove -Wdeclaration-after-statement?