|From:||Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|To:||Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox|
On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I thought there are some cases (though less) where we want to Shutdown
> the nodes (ExecShutdownNode) earlier and release the resources sooner.
> However, if you are not completely sure about this change, then we can
> leave it as it. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
OK, thanks. I committed that patch, after first running 100 million
tuples through a Gather over and over again to test for leaks.
Hopefully I haven't missed anything here, but it looks like it's
solid. Here once again are the remaining patches. While the
already-committed patches are nice, these two are the ones that
actually produced big improvements in my testing, so it would be good
to move them along. Any reviews appreciated.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
|Next Message||Alexander Kuzmenkov||2017-12-04 16:03:12||Re: [HACKERS] PoC: full merge join on comparison clause|
|Previous Message||Fabien COELHO||2017-12-04 15:47:34||Re: [HACKERS] pow support for pgbench|