| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, deniel1495(at)mail(dot)ru, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, tejeswarm(at)hotmail(dot)com, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Wood <hexexpert(at)comcast(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Corruption during WAL replay |
| Date: | 2022-03-29 17:04:56 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob4LbvFcjuw_CZca+JNRhCGQgJQxP2U0LbVnJutCkCeXg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 12:34 PM Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Anyhow, this whole thread has struck me as a good reason to polish those
> patches off and add on top of them an extended checksum ability, first,
> independent of TDE, and remove the dependency of those patches from the
> TDE effort and instead allow it to just leverage that ability. I still
> suspect we'll have some folks who will want TDE w/o a per-page nonce and
> that could be an option but we'd be able to support TDE w/ integrity
> pretty easily, which would be fantastic.
Yes, I like that idea. Once we get beyond feature freeze, perhaps we
can try to coordinate to avoid duplication of effort -- or absence of
effort.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2022-03-29 17:20:29 | Re: GSoC: Improve PostgreSQL Regression Test Coverage |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-03-29 17:03:32 | Re: Removing more vacuumlazy.c special cases, relfrozenxid optimizations |