| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only |
| Date: | 2011-08-26 18:36:36 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob+ZRqk7-m2TK1gsQT=kDiJZAnGf+C6-YTz97NiTQqQMQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> I don't have anything in principle against your '--sections="foo bar"'
> suggestion, but it would be more work to program. Simpler, and probably more
> consistent with how we do other things, would be allowing multiple --section
> options, if we don't want to have named options such as I have provided.
I wouldn't object to that, but "more work to program" probably means
about an extra 10 lines of code in this particular case.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-08-26 20:03:41 | Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2011-08-26 18:07:10 | Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress |