| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Not HOT enough |
| Date: | 2011-11-23 22:47:39 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoaayee12wTxcpxFk6viJuvy=5nfsFfs+3e-ZnA+SAzZJw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Computing two cutoffs is overkill for the rare event of pruning a
> shared catalog page. I did think of that already and its not a good
> solution. I'm tempted by the idea of getting rid of multiple databases
> altogether. The hassle of supporting that feature far outweighs the
> fairly low benefit.
That seems a rather sudden U-turn. The point of your proposal is to
improve life for people using multiple databases in a single cluster.
If that's not an important use case, why bother with any of this?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-11-23 23:00:37 | Re: Not HOT enough |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-11-23 22:43:15 | Re: Not HOT enough |