On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> You think it will confuse users less if we start telling them to use
> something that we have a very long history of telling them not to use?
I don't buy this line of reasoning at all. If we're going to rename
the GUC, it should be for accuracy, not PR value. If we start
renaming something every time we improve it, we're going to go nuts.
We improved lots of things in 9.2; they didn't all get renamed.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Geoghegan||Date: 2012-06-28 18:58:15|
|Subject: Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay +
commit_siblings (sort of)|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-06-28 18:51:20|
|Subject: Re: Posix Shared Mem patch|