Re: [PATCH] Fix for documentation of timestamp type

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for documentation of timestamp type
Date: 2017-01-04 21:32:39
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZooaWoB8k1taxWVnav==-rWSG3h_NeWtJ66fQJe1psSg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> I find this a bit unclear, because the revised text kind of jumps back
>>> and forth between the floating-point and integer formats. Perhaps
>>> something like this:
>>
>> Your wording seems OK to me, although I'd drop the "instead".
>
> Good idea.

Committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-01-04 21:37:52 Re: Logical Replication WIP
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-01-04 21:23:12 Re: [sqlsmith] Crash reading pg_stat_activity