Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Posix Shared Mem patch

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
Date: 2012-06-26 21:41:44
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> On 6/26/12 2:13 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of mar jun 26 15:49:59 -0400 2012:
>>>> Robert, all:
>>>> Last I checked, we had a reasonably acceptable patch to use mostly Posix
>>>> Shared mem with a very small sysv ram partition.  Is there anything
>>>> keeping this from going into 9.3?  It would eliminate a major
>>>> configuration headache for our users.
>>> I don't think that patch was all that reasonable.  It needed work, and
>>> in any case it needs a rebase because it was pretty old.
>> Yep, agreed.
>> I'd like to get this fixed too, but it hasn't made it up to the top of
>> my list of things to worry about.
> Was there a post-AgentM version of the patch, which incorporated the
> small SySV RAM partition?  I'm not finding it.

To my knowledge, no.

Robert Haas
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2012-06-26 21:44:13
Subject: Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
Previous:From: Daniel FarinaDate: 2012-06-26 21:40:16
Subject: Re: Posix Shared Mem patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group