From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Posix Shared Mem patch |
Date: | 2012-06-26 21:18:38 |
Message-ID: | 4FEA272E.4050503@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/26/12 2:13 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of mar jun 26 15:49:59 -0400 2012:
>>> Robert, all:
>>>
>>> Last I checked, we had a reasonably acceptable patch to use mostly Posix
>>> Shared mem with a very small sysv ram partition. Is there anything
>>> keeping this from going into 9.3? It would eliminate a major
>>> configuration headache for our users.
>>
>> I don't think that patch was all that reasonable. It needed work, and
>> in any case it needs a rebase because it was pretty old.
>
> Yep, agreed.
>
> I'd like to get this fixed too, but it hasn't made it up to the top of
> my list of things to worry about.
Was there a post-AgentM version of the patch, which incorporated the
small SySV RAM partition? I'm not finding it.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-06-26 21:29:33 | Re: proof concept - access to session variables on client side |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-06-26 21:17:12 | Re: proof concept - access to session variables on client side |