Re: NOTIFY in Background Worker

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, jacques klein <jacques(dot)klei(at)googlemail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NOTIFY in Background Worker
Date: 2015-11-06 05:32:27
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZWdARx_AjkAJAQ9fDkpNZYro0n-zwYie_NSRrGkDifmw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> Yes, the above description is good.
>
> +1

Committed that way, then.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2015-11-06 05:33:37 Re: Some questions about the array.
Previous Message Christian Marie 2015-11-06 05:00:49 [PATCH] RFC: Add length parameterised dmetaphone functions